MENU
Text/HTML
Overcoming the transition barrier - Postdoc to Faculty Q&A: Transitions Forum and Luncheon Overcoming the transition barrier - Postdoc to Faculty Q&A: Transitions Forum and Luncheon

Overcoming the transition barrier - Postdoc to Faculty Q&A: Transitions Forum and Luncheon

Srirupa Chakraborty 0 7036

Overcoming the transition barrier to become a junior faculty is possibly the most critical challenge faced by a postdoctoral trainee today.  Here is what some current search committee members have to say to guide prospective candidates in the right direction. 

Tags: postdoc#bps19Annual Meeting 2019#BPS19 #BaltimoreBiophysics careerpostdoc to faculty transition
Read more
Gold nuggets in the "Nuts and Bolts" Gold nuggets in the "Nuts and Bolts"

Gold nuggets in the "Nuts and Bolts"

E. Lynn Zechiedrich 0 5937

NIH Program Officers (POs) and Scientific Review Officers (SROs) with expertise in biophysics covered NIH proposal preparation do's and don'ts. Although the session was geared to the novice NIH grant writer, there was much to learn for veteran grant writers as well.

Tags: #nihfunding#bps19 #annual meeting #63rd Annual Meeting #NIH#science funding @LynnZechiedrich
Read more
RSS

Search Blog

Blog Categories

Blog Calendar

«April 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930123
45678910

Archive

Popular Tags

Latest Comments

SAHELI MITRA:

A must read.

Coronavirus Structure, Vaccine and Therapy Development
Brennan Weaver:

Pretty nice read. I wish I could have written something about Pi. It's my 2nd favorite number value. Also, I don't think Pi is as mysterious as everyone thinks it is. It's just a number with a lot of personalities. And I do believe there is a last digit.

Pi Is Encoded in the Patterns of Life
Harel Weinstein:

Just perused the article "From Dynamics to Membrane Organization- Experimental Breakthroughs Occasion a ‘‘Modeling Manifesto’’ in the August 21 issue. While the Perspective is intriguing, the sheer Chutzpah of writing a "manifesto" about a field of modeling with lists of "demands" based on experiments that in many cases are more limited in scope or reality than any physics-based model, is quite astounding. Neither artificial membrane slabs, nor "live cells" imaged under conditions in which cells have a shabby life that doesn't last long (how much of this is due to the mistreatment of the membrane proteins?) share established behaviors that must be matched or else.... No experiment, computational or using imaging, is meant to mimic reality, only to probe it based on models and assumptions that can be falsified.

As to the role of the cytoskeleton, what does this tell us about the membrane itself, or the behavior of membrane proteins as individual molecules in their interplay with the membrane? And since this unrelated scaffold differs greatly between cells, what is the "correct matching standard"? All models are wrong, some (computational, or on the stage of a microscope) are useful, but in my opinion, self-critical, humble, and rigorous scientific reasoning are preferable to a manifesto in order to foster progress.

In Search of…Protein Interaction Partners
Previous Next