MENU
Text/HTML
Nanoscale Optical Imaging Nanoscale Optical Imaging

Nanoscale Optical Imaging

Anonym 0 4501

We appreciate the opportunity to illustrate a new powerful technique, Tip Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (TERS) as cover art for the Biophysical Journal.  TERS, the combination of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Raman microscopy, provides chemical information with nanometer spatial resolution.  The cover image shows a TERS probe, a metal nano particle(s) mounted on an AFM tip, placed near an amyloid fibril.  A Raman signal is strongly enhanced in nanometer vicinity of the particle providing ...

Tags: cover artnanoscale optical imagingTERS
Read more
RSS

Search Blog

Blog Categories

Blog Calendar

«April 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930123
45678910

Archive

Popular Tags

Latest Comments

SAHELI MITRA:

A must read.

Coronavirus Structure, Vaccine and Therapy Development
Brennan Weaver:

Pretty nice read. I wish I could have written something about Pi. It's my 2nd favorite number value. Also, I don't think Pi is as mysterious as everyone thinks it is. It's just a number with a lot of personalities. And I do believe there is a last digit.

Pi Is Encoded in the Patterns of Life
Harel Weinstein:

Just perused the article "From Dynamics to Membrane Organization- Experimental Breakthroughs Occasion a ‘‘Modeling Manifesto’’ in the August 21 issue. While the Perspective is intriguing, the sheer Chutzpah of writing a "manifesto" about a field of modeling with lists of "demands" based on experiments that in many cases are more limited in scope or reality than any physics-based model, is quite astounding. Neither artificial membrane slabs, nor "live cells" imaged under conditions in which cells have a shabby life that doesn't last long (how much of this is due to the mistreatment of the membrane proteins?) share established behaviors that must be matched or else.... No experiment, computational or using imaging, is meant to mimic reality, only to probe it based on models and assumptions that can be falsified.

As to the role of the cytoskeleton, what does this tell us about the membrane itself, or the behavior of membrane proteins as individual molecules in their interplay with the membrane? And since this unrelated scaffold differs greatly between cells, what is the "correct matching standard"? All models are wrong, some (computational, or on the stage of a microscope) are useful, but in my opinion, self-critical, humble, and rigorous scientific reasoning are preferable to a manifesto in order to foster progress.

In Search of…Protein Interaction Partners
Previous Next